First did anyone report glaad's cussing?
Second do you have any solid proof to prove Alex was biased to you? You need to find examples of Alex actually punishing you and not someone else but proven that Alex actually saw the post.
Lastly you do not get to control who handles the report. Fry knows if the report is invalid that she can close it.
Yes the infraction was not needed, but considering all the other things you posted I can see reason as to why you would have been infracted. There is no rule saying that private profiles are exempt from the rules.
Now it's just deciding if there is enough proof to show he was biased

 

Like I said. Cyp had already warned you and you disrespect players about them hitting puberty.

 

The infraction in itself was incorrect, and it was proven biased when Zambi did the same thing in his status, but was not warned.

I can say wherever I want according to @Ares_Xena .

 

Huh? Saying '''' once or twice isn't a big deal. We remove it and move on. However, when repeating we are allowed to give an infraction. I'm sorry if I didn't make that clear.

 

Actually no.

All he wanted me to do was to stop harassing you openly, because he didn't like it, which I can understand.

If your own staff team condones the word "", then I will say , damn, and others where I please. With or without censor.

 

I was not repeating it. I censored it in just one status, No where else. Thats allowed right?

 

Sure.

 

Thats the point of the report then.

 

Really? Read the rules.

 

I would have just edited out the word. We dont really allow swearing- censored or otherwise, but unless there is a good reason to infract we dont. There was other reasons to infract I believe, not just because you swore and censored it.

Zambi's proof was gizz's "warning" (sorta) not Alex correct me if im wrong... so in order for the claim of biased to hold, your punishment would have needed to be applied by gizz or guided by Alex. Which you have to prove this was the case. Otherwise this report is on an incorrect infraction only, so lets discuss that.

 

https://gyazo.com/f5fb3b0ae8399a494fcd4dbcde05a157

Ok, lets discuss the latter.

 

And, I did tell KingAlex to infract glaad, but he never did.

 

on what post? was that the one that cyp infracted for?

 

The one where glaad made the abuse thread. He looked at it for an hour and did nothing. I even tagged him.

 

unless he was unsure how to handle it, im sure he would have infracted for it. Looking at a thread for an hour probably means he opened the thread and was afk on it which could be why he didnt act upon it. Either way only Alex knew what happened when he saw that thread.
So im going to stop posting here because its really none of my business but I do think if your infraction was based on one swear word and an insult on puberty then it was wrong, however if the infraction was on more than just that one post, then it would have been warranted.

 

That is not the case.
He went back and forth from this report to that thread for about an hour.
He didn't infract glaad, yet he came after me.
The infraction was about the one post, and he was being bias about it.

 

I didnt know how to handle her.

 

So, you knew how to handle someone censoring Sh*t

But you didnt know how to handle someone saying FKING FK U FUC FKNG SHT FKFKFKFKFKF SHT FUK

for reals?

 

I wasn't sure if the thread should be closed or what ibfract level to give her. Plus I've been away this whole week. I haven't had time to deal with this

 

It was the same situation.

You didnt either A) infract her
B)edit it out
or C) delete the thread.
That is plain bias.