1. Your forum name: technotim75
   
2. The offender's forum name: PandaBear__
3. A description of what rule they broke/how they broke it: rate abuse
   
4. Evidence/screenshots.

 

It's only 3 ratings..

 

This is funny coming from you. You hand out negative ratings like candy.

 

1928 positive vs. 344 negative
6 times as many positive vs. negative



If I rated you dislike, I disliked.
If I rated you disagree, I disagreed.
If I rated you old, your content was old.
If I rated you bad spelling, you have bad spelling.
If I rated you dumb, you were dumb.

I don't do serial rating.

 

The report he made of me thou

 

Besides, it's not under the same time span.
*Correct if I'm wrong* but, I don't think that is rate abuse.

 

4,835 positives given vs. 1 negative....
Pretty sure the amount of negative ratings you shell out is FAR higher than the average member.

 

This isn't abuse.
Closing.