EULA enforcement - Good or bad?

The EULA should've been enforced/created at the beginning of online servers, not years later.

 

I highly agree

 

AGREED.

 

Obv bad, the server might become pay2play then there will prob be under a 100 ppl playing mv

 

ALL OF THIS IS SO CONFUSING.

 

You can get ranks for free... Top month voter. Therefore MineVerse isn't really Pay2win unless you are @Swiftlicious who believes not everyone playing mineverse can vote. Now I see why you had this topic yesterday on skype :p

 

Minecraft is screwed.

 

Add in voting glitches and availability...well, just no. There are only 5 ranks given away anyhow, and a quarter of the time they are Titan ranks given to people already Titan, who AFAIK don't give away their Titan ranks to anybody. So there are usually only 2 or 3 ranks actually given.

Anyways, a few times I vote and it doesn't even register.

 

I honestly don't see a problem with Eula. Servers have already started to adapt.

 

Fair point

 

To be honest I'd rather just play below 1.9.2, because 1.9 pushing, 1.9 pushing *hits head against wall several times* is rather infuriating.

Some things in donor kits are a bit op, and on some other threads people have mentioned that non-ranks should be able to work towards earning donor kits which I think would be a decent solution to the whole 'pay to win' scenario.

 

EULA = bad

 

It's not "bad" just their current choices are.

 

Well ... I have a feeling Microsoft will intervene

 

A good amount of Titans get top voter,even though they already have the rank.And 60 people a year?No way...
It's still Pay2Play.