Removing ALL Pets from Infection.

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Loominati, Feb 21, 2015.

  1. Worph
    Offline

    Worph Active Member

    Messages:
    187
    Sorry but i do not support :/
     
  2. Alan
    Offline

    Alan Experienced Member

    Messages:
    637
    While I support the idea of this thread, I don't believe pet riders should be removed at all. They make for some pretty funny pets. :3
    I'd rather the concept of having pets to infection, or otherwise bringing pets to infection be impossible to do.
     
  3. Bakes32
    Offline

    Bakes32 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    399
    I agree, obviously, I haven't been very active with all my work lately but, I understand the struggle of seeing people doing this, it's been going on for ages. It needs to stop.
    Support.
     
  4. Loominati
    Offline

    Loominati Experienced Member

    Messages:
    1,368
    Remove all pets, When pvping, too many pets blocking our views and end up dying and same as for bowing :)
     
  5. Worph
    Offline

    Worph Active Member

    Messages:
    187
    Changed my mind Definite support! Even if it means losing my jeb_ sheep :/ jeb_ SHEEP OP
     
  6. Flazer
    Offline

    Flazer Boss Member

    Messages:
    3,706
    Suport
     
  7. Alan
    Offline

    Alan Experienced Member

    Messages:
    637
    [​IMG]
     
  8. MCheng
    Offline

    MCheng Experienced Member

    Messages:
    957
    I would give a compromise. Why don't make a rule for pet hidding, but not for like having pets? In the stronghold, some of us do a quick AFK on buttons, and some donors adapted to replacing this using pets. (@Alexa said this was allowed)

    I know a few guys who love their pets, so why not keep it that way, but make pet hiding something of a tempban. If it continues, you can always ban them to let them make a appeal.

    @fryzigg can ya tag cyp? This is serious.
     
  9. AmazingFireGirl
    Offline

    AmazingFireGirl Retired Head-Mod

    Messages:
    8,156
    There is a rule, this comes under the cheating rule, the consequence is a ban.
     
  10. MCheng
    Offline

    MCheng Experienced Member

    Messages:
    957
  11. MCheng
    Offline

    MCheng Experienced Member

    Messages:
    957
    oh okay :D thx (leme take some screenies :3)
     
  12. AmazingFireGirl
    Offline

    AmazingFireGirl Retired Head-Mod

    Messages:
    8,156
    But I do support this thread, removing will be much easier and will cause less havoc, there is already a rule about hiding/block with pets but I believe this could easily solve the problem
     
  13. MCheng
    Offline

    MCheng Experienced Member

    Messages:
    957
    meh, @Oppil (Oppil2002) should we close this? It already solved :I

    Wait, so fryzigg, you are saying its now bannable?


    WOOOOO
     
  14. ImTopmass
    Offline

    ImTopmass Boss Member

    Messages:
    3,188
    Yes it is bannable. Larry told us it is abuse of donator perks.
     
  15. Alex
    Offline

    Alex sweet roll Premium

    Messages:
    5,784
    I only said this a while ago when there was no rule, it is very much bannable.
     
  16. Loominati
    Offline

    Loominati Experienced Member

    Messages:
    1,368
    So, don't tag Cyp?
     
  17. Budderboy2004
    Offline

    Budderboy2004 Active Member

    Messages:
    129
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2015
  18. Scorv
    Offline

    Scorv Gaming Warlord Premium

    Messages:
    13,025
    Support, the pets need to go.
     
  19. Squire
    Offline

    Squire Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,836
    Support
     
  20. Obama
    Offline

    Obama Experienced Member

    Messages:
    727
    It's not agaisnt the rules to hide in pets.
     

Share This Page