My original idea was to have mods clear plots for players, however I just realised it doesn't solve the problem of a player not being able to do commands on their plot. @The Real Xtreme suggested this but I didn't realise, I've just tweaked it slightly. @Scorvix also said it should work as a /tpa command. All I did was bring the ideas together so if you are going to congratulate me on this idea. DON'T! It was those two fabulous mods. XD It would work in the way of a /tpa command. The mod would do /dispose (player name) to dispose of someone's plot. However, this will NOT have any effect whatsoever without the player approving. The player would do /accept to dispose of their plot or /deny to stop their plot from being disposed of. This will be a lot less hassle than my original idea because you get your commands back and the mods will only have to do it once. Then the player has control again and they can dispose of their plot change their username then it can carry on. I know a lot of players have given their support to my /clear thread these people include: @CountryGirl_ @Mr_Smiley_ @Jhow @DeltaWolf @8top @iTzLevisFFS @Pengeay @TheCoolNiceGuy2006 @Noobcrew and @CypriotMerks could you post your opinions?? EDIT:I have had another idea. How abouthead mods and people who have been a mod for over 6-9 months also get this command without the player accepting. They have shown they are able to be trusted. All the other mods should have it and it works like a tpa command for them. This would fix the issue as @TADS4 said about there being hardly any mods online. Support:30 Neutral:3 No support:4 I've added a poll
Support. What would be a good idea is that the mods can un claim it for you so you can re claim it with your current user name so you get to keep your builds
Thanks for the support so far. @Jhow you could leave a sign saying that it was your plot as far as I know /dispose won't get rid of your plot, it will keep it but you will get a new one. This is a lot better than just having /clear.
No support. I don't think this would work. If we were trying to get rid of an inappropriate plot, the player would deny. I understand that people have changed their name and lost possesion of their plot, but even if the player accepted, it wouldn't work because the names are different.
The server does seem to know who the person's plot is though. It may work because when I do /p h on opprison it knows that it is my plot but under my old name. Also when I've voted for the server and accidentally used my old name it still accepted it. If it doesn't work the command could easily be removed. Everything has to be tried first.
I also agree this would be good for head mods. I don't think the player (as @ParanormalPizza said) should need to accept. The head mods would only do it for a reason such as: an innapropriate plot, or a name change issue. In the case where it were for a name change, the player would of already agreed to it beforehand. Support.
The head mods aren't always online, but there are usually 1-2 mods online. As Scorvix said, it would have to be by the player UUID. Support.
Ok so head mods should be able to do this without the player accepting. I have had another idea. How about mods who have been a mod for over 6-9 months also get this command without the player accepting. They have shown they are able to be trusted. All the other mods should have it and it works like a tpa command for them. This would fix the issue as @TADS4 said about there being hardly any mods online.
