You could dislike almost any post and have a reason for it.

 

I think the only way to tell if someone had no reason is if they post on your profile something along the lines of "hahah get rekt I just gave you your first dislike."

 

Only an idiot would do that, what if they're clever though?

 

Question 1: No you would not be punished.

Question: 2: The player would have to give reasoning for the rating or the staff could decide to revoke it if it is decided the rating is clearly unfair based on given proof.

 

The general reason for "disliking" something is because you dislike the post, so why would you have to state a reason?

 

I have an IRL pic rated "bad spelling". This is the kind of thing I was referring to when I said rating a post negatively without reason.

Not at all.

Dislike is a rating that anyone can use. Ratings such as "bad spelling" with no spelling mistakes however is one that could be removed.

 

Thorraks just rated this post informative, when it is in no way informative. Is this rate abuse and can I report him?

 

No.

Jesus Christ... are we really going there? :eh

 

He is technically rate abusing, is he not?

 

No. Maybe he was informed by what you posted.

 

Alright then.

 

It's hard to tell. :>

 

everything u say inform me tho

 

Alrighty thanks for clarifying

 

wat if thorraks rats me bad spellin wen i cant relly spel

 

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

What if someone posted 100 posts in an hour and I liked 3 of them. Will it be rate abuse? As I said in a thread, I think rate abuse should be based around a ratio.

 

u ar verry rood MR

 

If you liked 3 of them in an hour, yes that would be classed as rate abuse/spam.