[Infection] Pet Hiding- Remove pets

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by KingAlex, Mar 13, 2015.

?

Should Pet Hiding Be Bannable?

Poll closed Jan 7, 2016.
  1. Yes

    76.9%
  2. No

    23.1%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    Hey All.
    I'm writing this because im getting sick of the pet hiders in infection. After Merkz Said it is not ban-able i Say Add it into the rules that it is. Or Remove pets from infection. If you Read the Rules it states:


    • Hacking/Cheating - Giving yourself any sort of advantage over other players unfairly via hacking or cheating will result in an immediate ban, no exceptions.
    This States that Cheating is ban-able, or any sort of advantage over other Players.
    In infection i see Players on temple, forest, Stronghold and Desert Pet hiding.
    This is unfair. It means players cant kill them, or do anything, ruining the game by al ways making sure they survive/ win.

    Make Pet Hiding Ban-able Or Completely remove pets from infection
    Example:
    Screenshot_17.jpg


    Thanks!
    King
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2015
  2. Loominati
    Offline

    Loominati Experienced Member

    Messages:
    1,368
    I wonder WHAT Cypriot is doing right now. Is he possessed? Pet hiding ruins the game! I wanna see how many ppl quit Mineverse until he make it bannable.
     
  3. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    Agreed, It is sickening me do death, all the Gods/titans finding new ways to pet hide.
     
  4. Loominati
    Offline

    Loominati Experienced Member

    Messages:
    1,368
    [E.g Donors with Non-Prestige]
     
  5. Scorv
    Offline

    Scorv Gaming Warlord Premium

    Messages:
    13,025
    Support. I myself have pet hidden to see the effects of it, and how useful it can be for the pet hider. And i found out there are times where it is impossible to hit the person in their pet.

    I know this is op, but it is too op. Its equivalent to having hacked items. Only offered a select few, everyone else is at a disadvantage.
     
  6. SSMH
    Offline

    SSMH Mythical Member

    Messages:
    6,461
    Agreed! Support.
     
  7. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    Thanks. Yes, its a huge disadvantage Like you said scorp. Its soo unfair. People who dont have /pet are at a huge disadvantage.
     
  8. Annual
    Offline

    Annual Experienced Member

    Messages:
    219
    I don't really see why it has to be a ban, that's pretty harsh considering the rules on this change so much, you could essentially get banned without knowing the rules.
     
  9. Loominati
    Offline

    Loominati Experienced Member

    Messages:
    1,368
    Pet hiding is Disadvantage to Non-Donors. They have no /pet command. Its too Unfair
     
  10. Zambiana
    Offline

    Zambiana Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    517
    Lol at people threatening to quit over this, same with the potions ordeal, it's laughable.
     
  11. Annual
    Offline

    Annual Experienced Member

    Messages:
    219
    Did I say it wasn't? No. I said that being banned for something that gets changed so much isn't fair either, after all, until now everyone thought it was a ban, now that it's been said it isn't people will be confused if the rule is changed.
     
  12. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    It should either be a ban or pets removed.
    No one has yet threaten to quit. Oppil said he wants to see how many do. I said its sickening me to death all the people pet hiding.
     
  13. LeeLee
    Offline

    LeeLee Experienced Member

    Messages:
    441
    Or we can remove pets on infection :)
     
  14. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    or that. Yes, just remove them.
     
  15. Blocky
    Offline

    Blocky Experienced Member

    Messages:
    1,585
    no support. I go into the pet and randomly hit and I kill them lol.
     
  16. SSMH
    Offline

    SSMH Mythical Member

    Messages:
    6,461
    Yup. @KingAlex maybe change the thread to that?
     
  17. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    Will do.
     
  18. finchy
    Offline

    finchy Experienced Member

    Messages:
    358
    I believe it should be ban-able.
    When I was a non-donor and a Recruit on Infected, I thought it was unfair for people who could do /pet slime:large.
    I actually have no idea why I still played it considering the fact non-donors couldn't win any rounds due to the donors.
    Support.
     
  19. KingAlex
    Offline

    KingAlex Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,645
    Thanks :) And agreed. Its too unfair for rct's or any non donors.
     
  20. Echoed_
    Offline

    Echoed_ Experienced Member

    Messages:
    956
    I have an idea for this situation
    People should keep pets, but not pet riders.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page